Why. It's depressing to look at 30 photographers world wide producing work that essentially is anonymous in that any one of them could have took it. It's a photograph. The subject, cannot change. It cannot be manipulated. It can be portrayed in any manner the photographer wants, but it will always be the same.
Can a building be photographed so that it could seamlessly be fitted in with Fauvism works, Baroque works and Surrealist works? Without post-production no. I highly doubt it (please, someone prove me wrong).
Again. Off topic. If I feel in need of an inspirational boost I find that instead of scrutinizing photography that will eventually lead my thoughts to a depressing reality, I find it somewhat mesmerising to look at these works by Cech artist Mila Judge-Furstova.
Encounter 2005
60cm x 110cm
I find this particular piece absolutely fascinating. When viewed in actuality rather than digitally or in print, the two end pannels of the triptych are pulled slightly forwards off the wall wich really helps you loose yourself in the work. as if you are subsumed by the endless trees. or awe-struck at the majesticity, and calming nature of the deer. either way i guess i think this is more inspiring than the latest Crewdson or whatnot.
The etching on the wall. Note the angled side pannels.
2003
Enchanted Forest 2010